<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Melamine in U.S. Formula “Acceptable”?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.babygooroo.com/index.php/2008/12/01/melamine-in-us-formula-%e2%80%9cacceptable%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.babygooroo.com/index.php/2008/12/01/melamine-in-us-formula-%e2%80%9cacceptable%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:14:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Green</title>
		<link>http://www.babygooroo.com/index.php/2008/12/01/melamine-in-us-formula-%e2%80%9cacceptable%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-30168</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babygooroo.com/index.php/2008/12/01/melamine-in-us-formula-%e2%80%9cacceptable%e2%80%9d/#comment-30168</guid>
		<description>Hi, Maggie! I appreciate your response. I started working on an update on the melamine issue earlier today, but it seems appropriate to note this correction here:

What the FDA found in Enfamil LIPIL infant formula products was not melamine but, rather, cyanuric acid.  Melamine and cyanuric acid are &quot;compounds in the same chemical family.&quot; (to quote from Mead-Johnson&#039;s web site)

This is used by Mead-Johnson in the cleaning of its equipment and, the company admits, trace amounts can then make their way into the formula produced on that equipment. To date, Mead-Johnson says their own testing has not shown any cyanuric acid in their formula. The FDA has stated that it is not concerned about current levels of melamine or cyanuric acid alone in formula. They would be more concerned, even at current levels, if a formula contained both compounds.

Now, as a parent, I am still not completely reassured, for the reasons I detail above. I am frustrated because this is not the first problem with formula (e.g., metal shavings has been found in packaging; independent testing has shown the actual nutritional content to be very different from that reported on the label; etc.), and I am disappointed that the FDA doesn&#039;t seem to be paying more attention to it or sharing its findings with the public. I hope new and expectant parents are made aware of the issues with formula so that they are making truly informed decisions if they choose to give it to their babies.

Thanks again!
Heidi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Maggie! I appreciate your response. I started working on an update on the melamine issue earlier today, but it seems appropriate to note this correction here:</p>
<p>What the FDA found in Enfamil LIPIL infant formula products was not melamine but, rather, cyanuric acid.  Melamine and cyanuric acid are &#8220;compounds in the same chemical family.&#8221; (to quote from Mead-Johnson&#8217;s web site)</p>
<p>This is used by Mead-Johnson in the cleaning of its equipment and, the company admits, trace amounts can then make their way into the formula produced on that equipment. To date, Mead-Johnson says their own testing has not shown any cyanuric acid in their formula. The FDA has stated that it is not concerned about current levels of melamine or cyanuric acid alone in formula. They would be more concerned, even at current levels, if a formula contained both compounds.</p>
<p>Now, as a parent, I am still not completely reassured, for the reasons I detail above. I am frustrated because this is not the first problem with formula (e.g., metal shavings has been found in packaging; independent testing has shown the actual nutritional content to be very different from that reported on the label; etc.), and I am disappointed that the FDA doesn&#8217;t seem to be paying more attention to it or sharing its findings with the public. I hope new and expectant parents are made aware of the issues with formula so that they are making truly informed decisions if they choose to give it to their babies.</p>
<p>Thanks again!<br />
Heidi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Honnold</title>
		<link>http://www.babygooroo.com/index.php/2008/12/01/melamine-in-us-formula-%e2%80%9cacceptable%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-30165</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Honnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.babygooroo.com/index.php/2008/12/01/melamine-in-us-formula-%e2%80%9cacceptable%e2%80%9d/#comment-30165</guid>
		<description>Recent information from our state WIC program indicates that &quot;U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that no melamine has been detected in Enfamil LIPIL infant formula products and that recent media reports indicating that trace levels were detected are inaccurate.&quot; I would suggest contacting STEPHANIE.BESS@illinois.gov with the Illinois WIC program for confirmation. Thanks, Maggie Honnold, RN/CLC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent information from our state WIC program indicates that &#8220;U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that no melamine has been detected in Enfamil LIPIL infant formula products and that recent media reports indicating that trace levels were detected are inaccurate.&#8221; I would suggest contacting <a href="mailto:STEPHANIE.BESS@illinois.gov">STEPHANIE.BESS@illinois.gov</a> with the Illinois WIC program for confirmation. Thanks, Maggie Honnold, RN/CLC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
